Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26935806af4e88e

Jump to content

Talk:First Battle of al-Faw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Why does this article talk about the 2003 invasion of the Al Faw peninsula? Surely that is not appropriate to the page relating to the battle that is part of the Iran-Iraq war —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.8.103.82 (talk) 08:05, 19 September 2010 (UTC) (Reply

Went looking for this since I realised I wasn't logged in when I added it. I think we need to look at removing the erroneous information until correct data can be found, but I would prefer if someone with more experience or knowledge did this properly.

Merging the article with Dawn 8

[edit]

I think the two articles should be merged together. Both articles are talking about the same battle but First_Battle_of_al-Faw is more comprehensive. so I suggest to keep this article and redirect Operation Dawn 8 to this article.--F4fluids (talk) 15:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

This proposal seems to have been closed with no action, but its seems that it was a good idea, as the scope is greatly overlapping and so the topic is best dealt with one one page. Indeed, there are 3 such articles, all of which should be merged: First Battle of al-Faw, Operation Dawn 8 and Al Faw peninsula landings. Klbrain (talk) 09:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
For Operation Dawn 8,   checkY Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
For Al Faw peninsula landings,   checkY Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 04:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


What's up with all the bracketed numbers?

[edit]

I'm seeing a lot of bracketed [] numbers, but there aren't hyperlinked references, they are just text. What's up with that?

Thom430 (talk) 11:26, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I guess that they were meant to be links to references copied from another source. They were created with this edit by Partridgeinapeartree who might be able to help resolve this question. Klbrain (talk) 13:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply