Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a248ae4e680a2780

Jump to content

Talk:First Apocalypse of James

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Austinball in topic No sourcing on Jewish origins

Sentence about dates of original texts may be unsupported

[edit]

Regarding the sentence: "One of the most curious features of the First Apocalypse of James is that the range of dating of its original text, assigned to it by scholars, requires that it was written after the Second Apocalypse of James."
That sentence was added to the article in an edit performed at 12:18, 11 June 2005. The text of the First Apocalypse of James to which the sentence refers is the text of the Nag Hammadi Coptic manuscript. Thankfully, somebody has tagged the subject sentence with a "citation needed" tag. If nobody comes up with a citation, the sentence should be deleted. Mksword (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

No sourcing on Jewish origins

[edit]

This section contains no citations whatsoever and reads like original observations. The use of terms like G-d is non-standard and smacks of religious opinion. 58.183.98.112 (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@58.183.98.112 It does seem the entire section should be removed. Concerned prior legitimate/cited material was removed when that section was added, as otherwise there is no analysis of the text at all. Mastakos (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I agree that the entire section should be removed. It was added by one person and feels like it reeks of religious bias. Austinball (talk) 07:28, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply