Talk:Finite morphism
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by Felix QW in topic Split the "morphism of finite type" section
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Finite => projective
[edit]This is true when projectivity is defined as in EGA II, § 5.5. I don't think finiteness implies projectivity in the stronger sense given in Hartshorne. Liu (talk) 00:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Split the "morphism of finite type" section
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Closed as split: No opposition after 4 years. Felix QW (talk) 21:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
I think "finite morphisms" and "morphisms of finite type" are quite different notions, and the latter is important enough to deserve its own article. So I suggest the section be split. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyxty (talk • contribs) 07:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.