Talk:Financial Times

Vandalism

I just found this under "Editorial Stance":

NOTE:Fiancial times is a key tool of US and UK propaganda and solely exists to advance their interests.It is thus not a credible and trustworthy source of information especially on topics critical of US and UK particulalrly on foreign interference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.228.172.99 (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Labour Party for the uk general election 2024? 68.199.243.137 (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Given that the Editorial Stance edit ("Vandalism") highlights some telling questions about the true nature of the FT, might it not be retained somewhere? 2.27.2.80 (talk) 18:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

UN-Affair: Journalism for another World War?

Given that some of the points highlighted were useful/of some interest, did the whole section of text need to be deleted? 2.27.2.80 (talk) 18:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Title and definite article

Is there any need for the definite article before 'Financial Times' throughout the piece? Even though it is not italicized, and so marked as not part of the title, it is still potentially misleading. 2A0A:EF40:1B2:E001:E4C0:C27B:8D42:1655 (talk) 02:28, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Redirect from Endpoints News to FT page

Hi, The FT acquired controlling stake of Endpoints News in 2023, although Endpoints News continues to be an independent publication. It would be good for Endpoints News to have its own page, but the name redirects to the FT page. How can one "undo" the redirect so a page for Endpoints (that references FT and links back to it) can be created?

MD-EPN (talk) 14:38, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Statistics across Wikipedia on circulation do not match up

On this page, the FT is listed as having a circulation of 104,971 whilst on the page named “List of newspapers in the United Kingdom by circulation” circulation is shown as 109,995.

I think either is fine but someone needs to find out which one is correct. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 07:12, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, what's keeping you from doing so yourself? Be bold! soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:36, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

I would very happily do it but, I cannot access the statistics because, they are not accessible without a paid for account. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 17:19, 8 June 2026 (UTC)