Talk:Finance Research Letters
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by 2603:7080:F300:5D:B58F:A437:BFF3:D6CB in topic Impact Factor
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Fixed it by adding context — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.104.7.174 (talk) 23:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Impact Factor
[edit]According to Randikitty who patrols this page often:
“Also in the real world, despite a lot of criticism, whether or not a journal has an impact factor is hugely important. The higher the IF, the more esteemed a journal is judged to be.”
Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Randykitty/Thoughts_on_NJournals
A link needs to be built between FRL as the most impactful journal in finance and its esteem in order to put things into perspective for the reader. Just reporting the IF has little value. 38.104.7.174 (talk) 23:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure what you are saying here, but I assume it's about the journal's IF ranking, which is given in the section "reception". --Randykitty (talk) 23:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Does it have a APC [article publishing charge], a bit different from submission fees [as in J. Finance]? 2603:7080:F300:5D:B58F:A437:BFF3:D6CB (talk) 04:29, 16 December 2024 (UTC)