Talk:FinanceWorks

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 January 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

digitalemi (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight.

Looks like a P.R. piece to me . . .

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Surely there are some drawbacks to using this business service. Also it would be nice to know something about its history, who developed it, the problems in rolling it out, etc. It is very unencyclopedic. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it definitely looks like an advertisement. The whole article is just a bullet-point list of features and quotes. The tiny "Missing Features" section seems like a (less than halfhearted) attempt to appear neutral. And it's very out of date too, as several of those missing features have since been added. Unfortunately, I don't know nearly enough about FinanceWorks to redo the article myself. Rycr (talk) 18:48, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Note that the significant contributor to this article was digitalemi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who is now banned. Vectro (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes - what about security? I stayed away from MINT for security access concerns. Is this better because it is business to business?

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:FinanceWorks

Looks like a P.R. piece to me . . .