Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a222f366e936c465

Jump to content

Talk:Final Exit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Nbauman in topic References in pop culture

Please tell me. . .

[edit]

How this book could be on the best seller list for 18 weeks in 1991 but be published in 1992??? HUH???

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Final Exit/CommentsTalk:Final Exit/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

There are no specific citations in this article. Also, the comment about libraries refusing to stock the book...is that just black humor?

Last edited at 06:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 15:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

References in pop culture

[edit]

I agree that the section "appears to contain trivial, minor, or unrelated references to popular culture."

The guideline WP:RS says, "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered."

If these references are not cited by at least more than one WP:RS, they don't belong in the article. I don't think any of those references meet that test. I think the whole section should be deleted. --Nbauman (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply