Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2384721b902910d

Jump to content

Talk:Filipino

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Cuchullain in topic Requested move 1 July 2015

Comments

[edit]

"Pilipino" is not slang. It is the Filipino language spelling of the english language "Filipino". Confused? That's because there is no "F" in the past Filipino alphabet. "Pilipino" is widely used in Filipino language government speeches, official Filipino textbooks and publications.

What is unofficial is Philippino and similar constructs. Maccess (talk) 07:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Should this be explained in the article? 24.17.107.251 (talk) 00:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pilipino vs. Filipino

[edit]

Philippines was named by Ruy Lopez de Villalobos "Filipinas"; "Philippines" was given by Americans upon territorial expansion. Letter "F" used to be missing in the original "Alpabetong Pilipino". And upon the Amendment of the Commonwealth Constitution, President Quezon added C, F, V, X, Z, to the revised "Alfabetong Filipino". Today, "Filipino" is accepted in english, and "Pilipino" if we are referring to the People in terms of our language. So don't fight over these two terms. (absalon-JL 09:14, 27 August 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xangsane181818 (talkcontribs)

Requested move 1 July 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain t/c 16:17, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply



WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. WP:CONSISTENCY. IF Tagalogs = people & Tagalog = language THEN Filipinos = people & Filipino = language. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 01:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Strong oppose the language is not the primary topic, Filipinos, the people would be, or the adjective for the Philippines, but not the language. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS- just because Tagalog is treated in this manner, does not mean that the same case exists here. Every primary topic discussion is separate and different because the relationship between topics that share the same name is different in every instance. You have not provided any evidence that the language is the primary topic over WP:ADJECTIVE use for the Philippines, or the people. WP:NOTBURO Consistency does not make it a primary topic. Note, the usage of TAGALOG is up for discussion, see talk:Tagalog (disambiguation), so it's not a much for consistency. -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 05:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Strong Oppose. "Filipino" can refer to a Filipino person or something relating to the Filipinos. Khestwol (talk) 10:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Strong Oppose. Filipino as an adjective is ambiguous and may refer to either language or people.--RioHondo (talk) 14:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.