Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a448ad10cb7e3564

Jump to content

Talk:Fiber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 days ago by Reconrabbit in topic Unexplained reverts

Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2023

[edit]

Artificial fibers are cheaper and lower quality meaning they do not have longevity. The process in which these fibers are made is harmful for the environment. Aguerrero13 (talk) 03:01, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Lightoil (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2024

[edit]

Synthetic fiber are textiles made form chemicals to create fibers like polyester, acrylic,nylon and many more. Wendyy815 (talk) 06:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Tollens (talk) 09:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2025

[edit]
103.152.147.176 (talk) 09:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Null edit request. LizardJr8 (talk) 15:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Unexplained reverts

[edit]

Hi @Roxy the dog: You're on the verge of an edit war. Can you please explain your revert of my edits? You've been asked to do so in my last edit summary. Wolfdog (talk) 17:28, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Wolfdog. Can you please explain your edits? - Walter Ego 18:10, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I did in the edit summary. It's Roxy's turn. Thanks Wolfdog (talk) 02:59, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I did in the edit summary. It's Wolfdog's turn. Thanks. - Walter Ego 05:01, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, you're the same person. It's fairly confusing when you have two names: Roxy the dog and Walter Ego. Also, your edit summary simply mirrored mine, which tells me nothing. I'm left to wonder "Is this snarkiness? Chaotic agreement with my point? The workings of a troll? (which is far from rare on WP)." Why don't you just write a clear, legitimate edit summary of your own? If you actually provided a quick argument, you might have simply convinced me right off the bat. So, I hope you can see there are now at least two ways how you've made dialogue here more obfuscating rather than clarifying.
Here's more detail on my motivations: the immediate prototypical associations we have with the word fiber are of natural fibers (twine, cotton, silk, etc.) rather than synthetic fibers, so I thought the primary image should reflect that. Any details you'd like to provide for your motivations? Thanks. Wolfdog (talk) 11:08, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
If my initial edsum tells you nothing, what do you think it told me when you used it? I'm following WP:BRD btw. - Walter Ego 11:23, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Right. I just discussed. Per the policy now: YOUR TURN. Wolfdog (talk) 12:26, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
What? - Walter Ego 13:26, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I see. here you go then - "Better before" - Walter Ego 14:06, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Regarding the current image of optical fibers. Why is this the best representation of fibers? Optical fiber isn't mentioned until halfway down the page. Certainly glass fibers are an important part of the global market but that is not obvious from the jump. When I think of fibers my mind goes to hemp or carbon fiber before glass fiber. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 22:10, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
To address the image of natural fibers: While images that include text aren't necessarily discouraged, there are caveats to their use. Generally I prefer an image without text to one with. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 22:31, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply