Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21ea1473c3aa151

Jump to content

Talk:Fever

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This range can't possibly be right, can it?

[edit]

In adults, the normal range of oral temperatures in healthy individuals is 35.7–37.7 °C (96.3–99.9 °F) among men and 33.2–38.1 °C (91.8–100.6 °F) among women

Isn't 91.8F waaaaay into the hypothermic range? Perhaps 98.1 was meant? -- Avocado (talk) 14:02, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

The source abstract states 33.2-38.1 °C indeed. I'll try to access the whole paper (and find perhaps more refs). cyclopiaspeak! 17:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
This is a more recent systematic review and gives more reasonable ranges. cyclopiaspeak! 17:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
I updated the article using the new source. :) cyclopiaspeak! 13:40, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! -- Avocado (talk) 21:17, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Contradictory source

[edit]

As far as I can tell source 19 contradicts the sentence it is used as a source for (While fever evolved as a defense mechanism, treating a fever does not appear to improve or worsen outcomes.). Since I'm not very knowledgeable in medicine (just feverish and bored) I don't want to change anything, but I thought this is worth highlighting. 2001:14BA:A0E1:9A00:6E8F:6FEB:8050:C55E (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Improving top-importance medicine articles: Join the Vital Signs campaign 2026

[edit]

The goal of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026 campaign is to bring all 101 top-importance articles—including this one—up to at least B-class quality. Many of these articles are widely read but overdue for review, so even small improvements can have a big impact.

If you watch or edit this article, your help would be very welcome. You can:

  1. Add yourself as a participant
  2. Note the state of the article in the Progress table (is the current class still correct?)
  3. Update the article based on recent clinical guidelines and review papers
  4. Help address gaps, improve clarity for a broad audience, or improve image selection

To reach B class, articles should have: suitable referencing, reasonable coverage, a clear structure, good prose, helpful illustrations, and be understandable to a broad audience. Contributions of any size are appreciated. Femke (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply