Talk:Fever
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fever article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 16 months |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Fever.
|
This range can't possibly be right, can it?
[edit]In adults, the normal range of oral temperatures in healthy individuals is 35.7–37.7 °C (96.3–99.9 °F) among men and 33.2–38.1 °C (91.8–100.6 °F) among women
Isn't 91.8F waaaaay into the hypothermic range? Perhaps 98.1 was meant? -- Avocado (talk) 14:02, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- The source abstract states 33.2-38.1 °C indeed. I'll try to access the whole paper (and find perhaps more refs). cyclopiaspeak! 17:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- This is a more recent systematic review and gives more reasonable ranges. cyclopiaspeak! 17:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- I updated the article using the new source. :) cyclopiaspeak! 13:40, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! -- Avocado (talk) 21:17, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- I updated the article using the new source. :) cyclopiaspeak! 13:40, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- This is a more recent systematic review and gives more reasonable ranges. cyclopiaspeak! 17:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Contradictory source
[edit]As far as I can tell source 19 contradicts the sentence it is used as a source for (While fever evolved as a defense mechanism, treating a fever does not appear to improve or worsen outcomes.). Since I'm not very knowledgeable in medicine (just feverish and bored) I don't want to change anything, but I thought this is worth highlighting. 2001:14BA:A0E1:9A00:6E8F:6FEB:8050:C55E (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
Improving top-importance medicine articles: Join the Vital Signs campaign 2026
[edit]The goal of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026 campaign is to bring all 101 top-importance articles—including this one—up to at least B-class quality. Many of these articles are widely read but overdue for review, so even small improvements can have a big impact.
If you watch or edit this article, your help would be very welcome. You can:
- Add yourself as a participant
- Note the state of the article in the Progress table (is the current class still correct?)
- Update the article based on recent clinical guidelines and review papers
- Help address gaps, improve clarity for a broad audience, or improve image selection
To reach B class, articles should have: suitable referencing, reasonable coverage, a clear structure, good prose, helpful illustrations, and be understandable to a broad audience. Contributions of any size are appreciated. Femke (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class medicine articles
- Top-importance medicine articles
- B-Class WikiProject Medicine Translation Task Force articles
- High-importance WikiProject Medicine Translation Task Force articles
- WikiProject Medicine Translation Task Force articles
- Medicine portal selected articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- B-Class Veterinary medicine articles
- High-importance Veterinary medicine articles
- WikiProject Veterinary medicine articles

