Talk:Festuca ovina
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Festuca ovina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061118162933/http://www.swcoloradohome.com/articles/gardening/greenthumb35.asp to http://www.swcoloradohome.com/articles/gardening/greenthumb35.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Wildlife value references
[edit]Hi Tsarivan613, you added the unsourced section template to the wildlife value section a few years ago. I recently added some references that support most of the claims in the section and a citation needed template for one particular claim I couldn't find any references for. Do you think the section is now appropriately referenced sufficiently that we can remove the unsourced section template? Alex McKee (talk) 10:13, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks @Alex McKee, I think it is a lot closer, but page numbers or ranges for your citations would be helpful. Thanks for providing ISBNs which helped me when attempting to locate the books cited. Feel free to take the section hatnote off. Tsarivan613 (talk) 17:14, 18 July 2026 (UTC)