Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22593d29946cc36

Jump to content

Talk:Felt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Tacyarg in topic History makes no sense...

Untitled

[edit]

I have been working primarily on the section on newer uses and developments in felt. I agree that the historical section could use some help. I will try to come back to this part. ~~Artful inquiry  Preceding unsigned comment added by Artful inquiry (talkcontribs) 18:45, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

See also?

[edit]

Would it be proper to include a link to Baize under the see also section? In cue sports, this fiber is often called felt (mistakenly at that), as can be noted here and here. I personally feel that this would be fair. However, the article for Baize would have to be expanded to reflect this as well, to prevent misunderstanding. But I'd be willing take time to make the adjustments there. -Poodle of Doom (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Archeological findings, anyone?

[edit]

History section needs smth more. Has there been any definite historical findings of ancient felts? How they were dated, when and where defintely was felting discovered - sure, legend about st cristoph and his colleague has some real ground, but exactly what and where?BirgittaMTh (talk) 11:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

History makes no sense...

[edit]

History claims that felt-making likely originated in East Asia, and cites a confusing timeline in Siberia, with dating back to the 2nd century BC.

However, the section also mentions a Sumerian hero said to have discovered felt-making - and this would have to have been centuries earlier than the Siberian dates given.

Can someone make sense of all this and rewrite the section in a way that actually gives the history clearly?

(This echoes someone else's plea for archeological information.) Mastakos (talk) 15:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, that's a good point. I'm not sure the reference given for the legend of Urnamman's discovery of felt is reliable for this information - it's a book called Bronze Age Military Equipment from Pen and Sword Books, which is not an academic press. I've put the Urnamman article up for a deletion discussion, as I can't find better sources. Back to this article - I've read through one of the sources, the 2007 journal article "Felting Between East and West", via Jstor, and I'm not sure it supports the point it's cited against in the article. Have tagged.
I'll wait to see if anyone in the AfD can find better sources for Urnamman.
Thanks for raising this. Tacyarg (talk) 16:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply