Talk:Feature scaling

File:After FS.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion: File:After FS.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Before FS.png has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:39, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

The equation as is does not make sense. min(x) does not make sense since x is a number. Better to use something like this: http://www.dataminingblog.com/standardization-vs-normalization/ 2001:8A0:FF93:2B01:B4C8:FAB6:A9D:F736 (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Rescaling formula does not do what it says

When subtracting the average value of x from the original value, you won't rescale the data between [0 1]. Also the example does not follow the formula.

Hoykiki (talk) 15:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspect formula for arbitary values is incorrect

Section to rescale a range between an arbitrary set of values [a, b], the formula becomes: ....... where a,b are the min-max values''

Formula I think should be min_a+(((x{i}-min_x)/(max_x-min_x))*(max_b-min_a)); 161.29.24.159 (talk) 02:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Haha, on closer inspection same result just written a different way so formula is correct :) 161.29.24.159 (talk) 02:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)