Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21dff261d1bde81

Jump to content

Talk:Fast fission

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Gah4 in topic Reasons

Jekyll and Hyde?

[edit]

Russian WP with a reference to an American book calls (fission–)fusion–fission bomb design a Jekyll-and-Hyde nuclear reaction. Anyone knows something about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.58.201.160 (talk) 15:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

yield peaks

[edit]

Near the end, there is a note about the reason the fission fragment peaks change. Note first that nuclides close to magic numbers are more stable, so fragments near those size are preferred. Higher mass fissile nuclides can get close to magic numbers with closer peaks. In any case, a citation is needed. Gah4 (talk) 03:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reasons

[edit]

The article says that slow neutrons are more likely to fission atoms. (That should probably be nuclei, but that is a different question.) For low enrichment reactors, the main reason for a moderator is to reduce absorption by U238. But yes, the fission cross section is larger for slower neutrons. In a high enrichment reactor, though, the chance of causing fission is high, fast or slow, except for neutrons that escape. Gah4 (talk) 03:34, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply