Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I think most of this article should be a Wikibook rather than a Wikipedia article.
It reads more like an assembly manual and advertizing whitepaper than like an article defining the term “FarmBot”.
Besides that, I doubt the neutrality.
(Except for syntax and grammar fixes, the entire article has been written by a single user.)
I feel that many positive statements are far from a realistic reality, or are just worded to sound positive.
For example the following statement:
It is estimated that the FarmBot Genesis produces 25% fewer carbon dioxide emissions than standard US food production.[1]
I agree. This article reads like a combination promotional brochure and how-to manual with lots of excessive detail which, were it a pop culture subject, would rightly be called "cruft." I have a feeling I'm going to get a lot of hate for this, but I've gone through and pruned out the geeky stuff in favor of the general interest reader. Anyone who wants to do a deep dive can follow the external links to the project's own website. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 20:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply