Talk:Fano factor
Add topicLatest comment: 12 years ago by EdwardGoldobin
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
The Fano factor was introduced to explain experimental results - is it really a part of math theory?
Maybe the definition could be like The Fano factor [Fano, 1947], like the coefficient of variation in probability theory and statistics, is a measure of [...]'.
JerzyTarasiuk (talk) 19:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure what it means to say "In particle detectors, the Fano Factor results from the energy loss in a collision not being purely statistical." I think this should say "from the energy loss in a collision not being purely elastic.", but I'm not sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.203.161.201 (talk) 15:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Although originally appeared in particle detector business, it is now used more generally. Thus, I thibk, it should also be defined more generally. The historical remark about detectors can be added later in the text. EdwardGoldobin (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- According to the definition, Fano factor has the same dimension as the measurable variable. In case of counts it is dimensionless. However if one measures the Fano factor of voltage fluctuations, one gets volts. In this sense claiming that F=1 is misleading. One should always specify the units. EdwardGoldobin (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)