Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22aea1bcdb298f1

Jump to content

Talk:Fand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 19 years ago by QuartierLatin1968 in topic Untitled



Untitled

[edit]

Aren't Fand the fairy and Fand the deity the same person? The Iron Age Celtic gods developed into the Tuatha Dé Danann, according to a very widely-held theory, and subsequently the latter developed into the fairies. The distinction between Fand 1 and Fand 2 would just be from the age of the literature in which her story's recorded; I believe it's a false distinction. QuartierLatin1968 El bien mas preciado es la libertad 04:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, same individual, false distinction. --Kathryn NicDhàna 20:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've done a fairly major rewrite on this. I left everything that can be sourced, though I rephrased much of it. I hid the speculation of her being a Manx deity, but am leaning towards cutting it. I assume this speculation is due to Manannan being seen as such, but I am aware of nothing that make that same assumption about Fand. I could see it, as she is also an "islands" deity and his "wife" (which in some cultures means "female version of"... though not so much in the Celtic lore).

Going back in to fix the sources. Actually, if the Manx speculation can be adequately sourced, please put it back in. But I want to get the flags off this so I'm ditching it. --Kathryn NicDhàna 20:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Right on! Good work. Q·L·1968 13:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply