Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26880e378d6891a

Jump to content

Talk:Fan Hongwei

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that Fan Hongwei turned a failing textile factory into the largest fiber producer in China? Source: "In 1994, Chen and Fan pooled their funds and bought a loss-making weaving factory. [...] In recent years, Hengli championed tightening environmental policies, growing into China’s largest fibre producer"

Created by Mx. Granger (talk). Self-nominated at 07:12, 3 April 2021 (UTC).Reply

  • Article is new enough (created April 2), long enough at ~2100 characters, well-sourced, and neutrally written; hook is interesting, cited, and supported by the provided source. QPQ done, this should be good to go. DanCherek (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: I feel there is notability issue. Sources provided in the article doesn't seem to have indicated notability. Sun8908Talk 08:56, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
I've added a few more sources to the article – hopefully some of them help address this concern. Most of the sources cited in the article are independent of the subject, and I think they're sufficient to meet GNG. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 10:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply