Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22779a579856c75

Jump to content

Talk:False Bay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Pbsouthwood in topic B-class review

Bay of Confusion, Bay of Mistake, Bay of False Ocean

[edit]

Coming from the East, seeing Cape Hangklip and mistaking it for the Cape of Good Hope, I turn North, imagining I'm following the Western coast of Africa; soon enough I'll discover I had been confused and I'm in a mere bay and not out on the open ocean.

Good names might have been —

  • Bay of Confusion
  • Bay of Mistake
  • Bay of False Ocean

Too bad this somehow became "False Bay".

Haim Berman (talk) 09:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Aerial photograph depicts the area upside-down?

[edit]

Why is the top-left of this photograph the South-East and not the North-West?

It is very easy to rotate the photograph before uploading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.77.77.249 (talk) 00:25, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree; I am just wondering whether to bother. JonRichfield (talk) 15:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Easy enough to replace it with an image providing better detail and less confusion. I have done so. --NJR_ZA (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

B-class review

[edit]
B-class review
  1. It is suitably referenced, with in-line citation:
    Adequately cited for the most part. There are some uncontroversial uncited items which to a large extent can be validated by observation.
  2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious holes:
  3. It has a defined structure:
  4. It is reasonably well-written:
  5. It contains supporting materials where appropriate:
  6. It presents its content in an appropriately understandable way:
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Always room for improvement, but looks OK to me for B. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 09:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply