Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As the footnote implies, the marriage was covered by the Times, and to an extent that, by policy, is applicable only to weddings carried out in (or is it "close to" in some specific sense of the term?) NYC. There was a correction published in about the following week: it took place in CT, IIRC a while before NY had gotten its act together about right to marry, and the reception in NYC was reported as being the wedding. IIRC the correction amounted to both stating the real fact, and noting that it should not, by policy, have been reported at all bcz it wasn't (whatever it appeared to a reporter to be?) a wedding. --Jerzy•t20:35, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
