Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2657773aa317fd8

Jump to content

Talk:Faecalibacterium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 216.165.127.1 in topic NCBI classification does not match the classification

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Elainat16.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

NCBI classification does not match the classification

[edit]

The classification of the Family does not have the same classification that on NCBI link provided (Ruminococcaceace vs Oscillospiraceae). This is in line with SILVA database (and probably others) but can be confusing for users looking for information about it. Probably this happens with other taxonomic units, not sure if there is a consensus on how to make this aware to readers or which "standard" wikipedia follows.

Dròpol (talk) 09:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Indeed. This is the work of a single editor who seems to introduce a non-established taxonomic classification. Same editor wrote the article of Oscillospiraceae. neither silva nor latest research agree with the classification presented here on wikipedia: eg https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676633/ which compares Fp genomes to other Ruminococcaceae, the family to which Fp belongs by what appears to be consensus. this needs fixing. 216.165.127.1 (talk) 18:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

boosting immune system

[edit]

According to the science-based medicine site, there is no such thing as “boosting the immune system” JuanTamad (talk)