Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2608f1c3ab71709

Jump to content

Talk:FRP Advisory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Fayenatic london in topic Adverse publicity

Notability

[edit]

The firm's website claims that it is "one of the largest independent restructuring, recovery and insolvency firms in the UK". A brief inspection of the Insolvency Practitioners' register seems to confirm that it is a significant player in its field (search for practitioners in London, and several from FRP Advisory appear on the first and second pages). There has also been sufficient coverage of the firm and its assignments in the press to confirm notability per WP:ORG.

Although it may not add much in the specialist sense of notability on Wikipedia, the firm's history is also interesting as its predecessors cover two of the three "consolidators", listed companies which tried to build national accounting businesses by acquiring local firms. Only RSM Tenon is left in general practice, and FRP Advisory as a specialist firm. – Fayenatic (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Adverse publicity

[edit]

@Brookie: I also noticed the deletion of the section about adverse publicity, but as the material was tagged as uncited, I considered that the deletion was proper, so did not revert the deletion. Even if cited, would the material not belong in the Vantis article rather than here? The action criticised, and at least one of the alleged criticisms, took place before formation of FRP. – Fayenatic London 18:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply