Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24a11f3eb6b4f87

Jump to content

Talk:FREELANG Dictionary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Iubito in topic referenced changes

referenced changes

[edit]

Here is the link that proves that the change is correct and true : http://forum.lokanova.net/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=30409 Leelou1000 (talk) 21:24, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Leelou1000Reply

It's a forum... come on... Read WP:RS Diego Grez (talk) 22:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it is the official forum for Freelang. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.250.178.225 (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Reply
Wikipedia.fr gives the proof that this forum is freelang official forum. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freelang#Communaut.C3.A9 --iubito (talk) 07:35, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Spam

[edit]

I have removed the spam of the page. --MisterWiki talk contribs 13:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

License, etc.

[edit]

The site/org is pretty confused, but surfing around I finally realized that the same organization is standing behind www.freelang.org and www.freelang.net. Just in case someone wondered. The site is also heavily loaded with advertizements, which nevertheless don't affect the validity of the site and its free dictionaries.

The license is not open source. The license heavily confuses the dictionaries with one program, prob a client. It makes CopyLeft-like statements of full attribution of all contributors, then prohibits all commercial redistribution for profit. Contributing to it is not a fair deal for the contributor. The license won't pass through any OpenSource validation. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 08:38, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply