Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a220106f3b98cf56

Jump to content

Talk:Exponential utility

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Bequw in topic Formula

Formula

[edit]

The formula is currently , which is not the most convenient form. The most used form of this utility function is when only risk-aversion () is allowed and the formula is . The 1 is only for the convenience of having non-negative utility. If we want to allow non-risk-aversion behavior then we to allow for . To keep utility increasing in c that means we need to divide by a. But in order to maintain the reason for the 1 we need to define it as so that it stays positive (this is not the case with the current formula). We also need to define the formula for (risk-neutrality) which should be . I think we should note in the article the simple (only risk-aversion) formula and then the 2-case setup allowing any risk preference. --Bequw (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply