Talk:Expert Political Judgment
Add topicLatest comment: 6 months ago by ~2026-16854-6 in topic Misleading
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 16 June 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 00:27, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? → Expert Political Judgment – Per WP:SUBTITLE. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. buidhe 11:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 08:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Misleading
[edit]::Tetlock, in fact, did not measure experts against everyone in the world, but against basic benchmarks, especially the predictions of other experts. The question wasn’t whether experts were no better than anyone else at prediction, but why some experts seemed better at prediction than others, which is a very different question.
From: https://aeon.co/essays/its-time-to-reboot-the-relationship-between-expertise-and-democracy
So this article is misleading.