Talk:Examining magistrate/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 12:40, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Neutrality I feel that the article could use more images. Maybe a color coded map illustrating use? I'm a bit confused when you say something like "are among the countries," because that makes me feel like there are others that are just not talked about. What about south america? Canada? Asia? Mexico? Oceania? I'd compare this article in scope to Prison education, where you can see that coverage issues de-railed a FAC. So, if there are other countries that use the Examining magistrate, they at least need a mention. If there aren't, then let me know. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Eddie891: South America is addressed in the Latin America section. The other countries you mentioned don't seem to have the examining magistrate as a feature of its judicial system. Thanks --Neutrality^talk 22:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Neutrality would you check to make sure the map I added is accurate, I will change to reflect if it is not. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

I actually think we may not want to have a map because the role of the investigating magistrate is different in each country, and because the green text (in Latin America) is mostly historical rather than present-day. Neutrality^talk 03:21, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed