Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a238db73efd5d937

Jump to content

Talk:Exact statistics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cryptarch in topic Advertisement
[edit]

I think the ads for the computersoftware should be removed

XPro is a free software package and so it is a good idea to have the link so that users can perform exact parametric methods at no cost.

I also agree that StatXact link may serve as an ad. Since it is a commercial software package the link is removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweeraha (talkcontribs) 14:29, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

It seems like we are in an edit war with User:Ionlycametosay who really wants to keep restoring those advertisements. I just undid the most recent additions, having previously removed them eight years ago. If Ionlycametosay really wants those ads, please give your arguments on this talk page. Cryptarch (talk) 23:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

[edit]

Not sure why we need two articles so similarG716 <T·C> 01:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The text of the two articles isn't that similar, though they both need work. The topics aren't synonymous—'exact statistics' is a broader topic than 'exact test' as the former includes exact confidence intervals. Exact tests are a more straightforward topic than exact confidence intervals and usually encountered first so there may be merit in separate articles. So perhaps we could have an article on 'exact tests', one on 'exact confidence intervals', and a shorter one on 'exact statistics' introducing both? --Qwfp (talk) 10:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
The articles aren't similar, I'm with Qwfp on this one. 98.221.85.188 (talk) 14:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree, they are two separate things. Removing the merge notice. ScienceApe (talk) 00:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Reference

[edit]

It appears that there is an incorrect reference. Based on my checking of the Journal, the following reference does not exist (or is incorrectly referenced):

  • Mehta, C. R.& Patel, N. R. 1997. "Exact inference in categorical data". Biometrics, 53(1), 112-117.

It is possible the reference could be as follows:

  • Mehta, C.R. and N.R. Patel, 1998. Exact Inference for Categorical Data. In P. Armitage and T. Colton, eds., Encyclopedia of Biostatistics (Chichester: John Wiley), pp. 1411-1422.

Can anyone confirm? Mari370 (talk) 14:37, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I was not able to verify the reference and so I took it out. Sweeraha (talk) 17:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply