Talk:Evolution Tower

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Evolution Tower2015.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Question?

Is the building earth quake proof? 208.102.114.178 (talk) 03:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, this issue is already 2 years old, but... Obviously, 90% of such buildings are resistant to earthquakes. Specifically, this (and Moscow City in general) can withstand a 7-point earthquake. By the way, the strongest po in Russia in 1970 reached only 6 5.142.42.153 (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

!UNST

THE FIRST THING THAT IS AMAZING FOR REST ROOM! YOU KNOW HOW YOU ARE YOU HAVE👍 YOU HAVE THE RIGHT THINGS THAT YOU ARE AWESOME ABOUT AND HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT IT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.44.96.180 (talk) 14:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

This comment looks like broken English; I wonder what it means? Appletonclack (talk) 14:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Active voice for passive error?

Is this a translation from another language? Article says, "In 2016, Snegiri claimed that Snapbox had unjustly enriched for US$127 million, ...." Does this require the insertion of "been" with this result: "In 2016, Snegiri claimed that Snapbox had been unjustly enriched for US$127 million,..."? (Appletonclack (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC))

It appears that the uncertain "would be" should be changed to a definite statement

Article says, "Space of the Evolution Tower would be utilized primarily for office purposes but there would also be shopping galleries, boutiques, restaurants, cafes, a supermarket and banquet halls." This statement is footnoted to 2018. Are not the purposes of the tower established by now? Should "would be" be changed to "have been"?(Appletonclack (talk) 14:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC))