Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22e34b4fcf3f4e0

Jump to content

Talk:Evolute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by RDBury in topic Deleted natural parameterization material

I disagree with Mathworld's page on two points:

  • involutes are not unique and thus "The original curve is then said to be the involute of its evolute" is wrong
  • what is the evolute of a sequence of circular arcs, if not disconnected points? And what would be an involute of that?

I'm trying to raise Eric by email 142.177.124.178 14:29, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)


Continuing the "what to do without a natural parametrisation" stuff: it often happens that is simpler/easier than . That may be useful.

Let . Differentiate once . Fit these into the lower expression to get

It so happens all the s's go awaythat sqrt can be avoided. Of course we still need ... 142.177.124.178 02:45, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)

It can really help! Evolute of ellipse:
(with shorthand C=cos(t), S=sin(t))
evolute =
the almost-astroid fell right out 142.177.124.178 15:20, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Added animated gif

[edit]

I've added an animated gif showing how the evolute is constructed as the locus of the centers of curvature. The tangent to the astroid is also shown, illustrating simultaneously that the evolute is the envelope of the normals to the curve.Juliusllb 23:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)  Preceding unsigned comment added by Juliusllb (talkcontribs)

Deleted natural parameterization material

[edit]

I deleted some of the material on natural parameterization, specifically the paragraph on dealing with the equations when s is not a closed form expression. First, the material was about simplifying the expression for derivatives in this case and not about evolutes. Second, the expression obtained should, when all the dust has settled, be the same as the expression in the general parameterization case (else there is an error somewhere). Third, I could not find similar material in references. --RDBury (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also deleted the line

Intrinsic equation of the evolute of a curve defined by an intrinsic equation r=f(s) is .

I could not find a reference or a clear definition so I could verify it myself. If someone can clarify or site a source it could probably be re-added.--RDBury (talk) 20:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also moved statement about parallel curves to the article on parallel curves.--RDBury (talk) 20:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply