Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a45afd2ab995fad3

Jump to content

Talk:Ever Oasis/GA3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 hours ago by A412 in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Monathephantom (talk · contribs) 16:16, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: A412 (talk · contribs) 22:06, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply


I'll take a look at this. ~ A412 talk! 22:06, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Monathephantom, I'm sorry, given the previously insufficient review, but I'm going to have to quickfail this. This article performed substantially under GA standard for spotcheck - almost every source I checked had verification problems, including quotes that appear to be entirely detached from the actual text in the sources. ~ A412 talk! 22:35, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, lists, and tables):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions and alt text):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

References

[edit]

References numbers as of this revision.

Spotcheck

[edit]
  • [3] - "aimed higher" does not appear in the source.
  • [4] - Fine.
  • [6]
    • Each of the three tribal races have distinct weapon types; the spear wielding Darkus, the hammer wielding Serkah and the dual blade wielding Lagora. Enemies have strengths and weaknesses towards them - Neither source 6 nor 7 appears to contain this information.
    • Most negative is a strong superlative. In this case, Metacritic says Slant Magazine has a lower-scoring review: .
  • [9] - "a collection of familiar ideas pieced together in a unique way" does not appear in the source.
  • [17] - Fine.
  • [18] - This source is in Japanese. What is "compact, playable game" a quote from?
  • [19]
    • Ever Oasis was difficult to put together from both of its central mechanics, which were dungeon crawling and oasis management. Ishii reflected that even though the original concept of Ever Oasis had been designed logically, developing it proved difficult. - The source does not appear to support this information.
    • "far more people have a 3DS than a Nintendo Switch" is a misquote. Source has "The big reason is that more people own the 3DS than the Switch".
  • [22] - A trailer was shown, and mission gameplay was demonstrated; though it was not playable for convention attendees. - The source does not support the last part here. It is silent on whether the game was accessible to attendees.
  • [26] - Fine.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.