Talk:European Environmental Press
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of [[Category:Environment]] on the article page.
- If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
- If you disagree with this assessment, please:
- Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale;
- Remove the stub template from the article.
Nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The sources cited for this article are all at least 7 years out of date, and the organization, as far as I can tell, no longer exists (its website no longer does, and I can't find any references to the EEP more recent than 2016). Three of the sources (2, 5, and 6) mention organizations/institutions that have been nominated for an award from the EEP, but that doesn't show that the EEP itself is notable.
Source 1 doesn't mention the EEP at all as far as I can find.
Sources 3 and 4 reference the same book, which mentions the EEP once, stating that a magazine is published by the EEP.
None of these sources show why the EEP is notable, and the article does not make a credible claim of significance. Tangledyarn (talk) 01:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC)