Talk:Euphories

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected, closed by Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the Videoclub album Euphories has a retro aesthetic?

• Source: https://www.hercampus.com/school/muj/is-videoclub-basically-french-tv-girl/

• • Reviewed:

Created by A.Classical-Futurist (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

A.Classical-Futurist (talk) 04:10, 28 March 2026 (UTC).

• I'm not 100% sure that this article meets the required length. According to WP:DYKLEN, "Text that is not original does not count", so if you remove the quoted reviews for example it I believe it would fall short of what is needed. Could I get a second opinion on this please? ISD (talk) 12:58, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
  • ISD is correct. Removing the three quotations in the "Reception" section leaves the article at 1,087 characters, well short of the 1,500-character threshold. A.Classical-Futurist, please add additional material to the article or this nomination will be marked for closure. Thank you! Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:15, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
• Please don’t close this nomination yet, I try to rectify my error and add more material, but I’m going to be busy for the next few days or so and may not be able to for about a week. After that, I’ll be right on it. A.Classical-Futurist (talk) 05:20, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  • A.Classical-Futurist Yes, I understand. In the meantime, as Dclemens1971 mentioned in the review of my article nomination for Trawl, I will complete the rest of this review. The article is certainly new enough. References all appear to be fine (I've added the names of publishers in the references that missed it). Hook seems fine, short and referenced. Image is OK. QPQ not required. It's only the length that needs sorting out, so at the moment it is currently a maybe.
• Y Done, article expanded passed the 1500 character minimum. Prost, A.Classical-Futurist (talk) 18:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Yes the article all seems to be good now. Approving. ISD (talk) 19:40, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Re-opening discussion to allow further time to address concerns raised at WP:ERRORS regarding quality of sources (there is one deprecated source according to Cite Unseen) and other issues within the article text. @A.Classical-Futurist and Dclemens1971: Please see also under discussion Cielquiparle (talk) 14:59, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

• I was not the reviewer here; I simply commented on one point of ineligibility early on in the review process and ISD did the full review. That said, Fram's objections at ERRORS are all well-founded, and A.Classical-Futurist, this nomination will likely be marked for closure if they are not addressed within the next few days. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

@A.Classical-Futurist: Please respond to the above. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:53, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

• Okay, I fixed the afterfore mentioned issued; I changed "retro vibe" to "pastel melancholy," I changed the phrase "synthpop electronic keyboard" to just "synthpop," and I removed the deprecated reference. In addition to these corrections, I'd like to suggest the hook be changed to: "... that an album with 80s' and 90s' inspired music has been described as having 'positive melancholy?'" (Source: http://www.rfm.fr/news/VIDEOCLUB-en-interview-sur-RFM-21917) As a final note, I'd just like to say that I'm sorry for the delay/wait; I've been studying for school exams the past few days and haven't had much time to edit Wikipedia, thank you for waiting and for not closing the nomination quickly. If there are any addition errors I've made, please ping me and I'll try to rectify them as soon as I can. Prost, A.Classical-Futurist (talk) 01:40, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

• Needs someone to do a final review of the article to make sure the Fram issues have all been addressed and there aren't any newly introduced issues. Pinging both ISD and Dclemens1971 to see whether either can do this important final step, given the limited time remaining. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

• I find both hooks to fall short of WP:DYKINT and would not approve them myself. No objection if someone else wants to move this along though. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:26, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Given the backlog, disagreement over a hook, and currently intense PEIS issues, I'm marking this for closure per DYKTIMEOUT. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)