Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a250655c3d676c75

Jump to content

Talk:Euler line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Duoduoduo in topic Mistake in diagram

Nine-point circle

[edit]

How can Euler have proved that these four points lie on the same line if the 9 point circle wasn't discovered until Feuberbach?--345Kai 12:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

You're right, it seems he didn't prove it as he only defines points O, G, H and I in his article. I fixed the article. --Shenanenigans (talk) 19:47, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Complement?

[edit]

The last paragraph says, "The Euler line is its own complement, and therefore also its own anticomplement."

What is a "complement"? What is an "anticomplement"?

Nwbeeson 20:24, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mistake in diagram

[edit]

The attached diagram has a mistake. On the left side of the triangle, the square "right angle" indicator is attached to the orange median, rather than the green line that helps define the circumcenter. Since the circumcenter lines are defined to be at right angles to the side, and in general the median can make any angle with the side (and certainly does not make a right angle with the side in this diagram), the right angle indicator should be attached to the green line instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.0.58.125 (talk) 20:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for catching that! It is a small mistake, with the black edge of the square extended only slightly too far, but it would be nice to have it corrected. I looked on the page that the image is linked from, and it appears that only one person who has ever contributed to the diagram is still on Wikipedia. I've left him a message asking him to read your post here. Duoduoduo (talk) 21:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply