Talk:Essiac
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by CorbieVreccan in topic Perennial target for addition of opinion, unsourced or poorly sourced content
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to complementary and alternative medicine. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Essiac article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Perennial target for addition of opinion, unsourced or poorly sourced content
[edit]I have semi-ed the page. I have edited here, so anyone with issues with this, feel free to ask for changes in protection level at WP:RFPP. I've only set if for two months, but I predict indef coming shortly. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 23:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)