Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a235be15d9d13cd0

Jump to content

Talk:Eric Garris

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Nicmart in topic "Non-partisan"?

Foremost pioneer

[edit]
  • It would not be an exaggeration to count Eric Garris among the foremost pioneers to tap into the power of the internet, and he may well go down in history as the first to truly harvest its revolutionary political potential. Early on he led the way in tapping into the power of the internet that was absolutely vital for the present old right revival, first with helping found the online magazine LewRockwell.com.

While I have no reason to doubt that Garris helped with LRC, the rest of this statement makes bold assertions that we'd need to attribute to a notable source. -Willmcw 16:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

This entry is promotional fluff in most respects. It also refers to lewrockwell.com as a “prominent” web site, but today its ranking among all US web sites is 10,954th. Antiwar.com is ranked 34,343rd (Alexa). Nicmart (talk) 19:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Briggs lawsuit

[edit]

The article mentions that Garris was one who sued Briggs for absenting himself from a debate. The lawsuit had some sort of resolution or withdrawn. Unless that information is included, the statement should be removed. Nicmart (talk) 19:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Non-partisan"?

[edit]

It seems like a major stretch of the word "non-partisan" to use it to describe AntiWar.com here, given the very clear conservative bent of its founders. Being willing to criticize both parties is not "non-partisan," as one can - and these folks apparently do - criticize the Republican party from the right; the section about libertarian dissatisfaction, for instance, does not mention that they considered an entryist strategy towards the Democratic party. 2600:1004:B1A3:85B9:D5B3:90AC:42F:70E9 (talk) 13:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Libertarians are not conservative. I personally knew Garris and Raimondo. They were both slavish supporters of anarchist Murray Rothbard, who detested modern conservatives, as did they when I knew them. Articles are not supposed to adhere to your biases. Nicmart (talk) Nicmart (talk) 00:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply