Talk:Equivalent concentration
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Equivalent concentration article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Better Initial Description
[edit]The first part of this page doesn't have much info, and is a little hard to understand. Many other parts of this page are hard to understand.
Njaohnt (talk) 19:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ive revised the initial information to better introduce a new person to the normality concentration. The initial formula of Normality was wrong it is not Molarity divided by equivalence factor. The analogy of molarity to normality may help other people to understand Dicorylether (talk) 12:36, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
Equivalent concentration
[edit]Equivalent concentration is a better name considering that this concentration is referring to the number of equivalents in a given volume of mixture.--MagnInd (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
sulfuric acid example
[edit]I think the example of sulfuric acid is wrong. While sulfuric acid is diprotic, the second dissociation is not complete. Can an expert please comment? 2600:1000:B11D:4707:8D4:CD75:F090:8EAA (talk) 22:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Article still needs content improvement
[edit]I've tried cleaning up this article from a readability and "encyclopedic" perspective, but a lot of the content still seems lacking. Particularly, I think more focus could be put on the "reaction unit", as this definition is what determines Normality (ex: H for acid-base reactions, "electron" for redox, etc). This is also where the dislike of the term "normality" by IUPAC stems from - that the term relies on the definition of the reaction unit, and is therefore imprecise. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 22:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Nikolaih in spite of the above, I think the tone of the article is now improved. Do you think the "Tone" tag can be removed? PhotogenicScientist (talk) 01:14, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- It is a bit odd to have the heading "What is Normality?" I think it still needs some cleanup tag, can change the tone tag to a different one if you desire. Nikolaih☎️📖 17:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Good catch on that section heading. I've updated it.
- I looked through the list of templates, and none stood out to me as obviously necessary. Unless you have one in mind to propose, I would just remove the "Tone" tag. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- It is a bit odd to have the heading "What is Normality?" I think it still needs some cleanup tag, can change the tone tag to a different one if you desire. Nikolaih☎️📖 17:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)