Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello. I noticed that this article was in need of a Psychology expert and I was curious to find out what the criteria for being an expert is. I have taken a couple classes on it and I really enjoy reading about anything psychology related. I like getting lost in psychology related research. I wanted to contribute, but I do not want to get in the way. Let me know if you would like a little extra help:) --tRekKerSandlia[Talk]19:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hi tRekKerSandlia! Yes, we can always need a little extra help. People like you and I make this encyclopedia. And as to your question, the tag is usually put there by an editor who feels that s/he doesn't know enough about the subject to be able to improve the article. If you know enough about Equipotentiality to contribute, and if you have good, secondary sources – and please also check WP:MEDRS – then please be bold and work on the article! With friendly regards, Lova Falktalk08:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
We are part of a psych class helping to improve articles on Wikipedia. We added content related to equipotentiality as well as further defined and explained equipotentiality. We also moved the information already here into a subheading. The information under the two subheadings still need sources to confirm the information.
Jesse.Kipp (talk) 23:39, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Steph Sorenson (talk) 23:49, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
MaryG6279 (talk) 02:12, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Might it be useful for someone who is knowledgeable about this topic to add a section on 'Current Thought', or the current state of or work on the theory? I see that the current section on neuropsychology somewhat begins to do so.UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 20:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
