Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23e0c51c977689d

Jump to content

Talk:Equine ethics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Gnomingstuff in topic Possible AI generated text

Washing Machine Heart (talk) 18:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality dispute

[edit]

@Grorp: Why is this article's neutrality being disputed? Jarble (talk) 18:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

(Been months since I last looked, but I'll give it a stab.) Though most of the article correctly discusses the subject of ethics as relates to equines, this article goes on to introduce quite a bit of unsourced or unattributed animal rights opinions in wikivoice as if they are fact. Here are just a few samples:
  1. Certain legal practices degrade the horse to the status of a "product"
  2. Horses are often used as sidekicks by inexperienced riders
  3. This "instrumentalization for pleasure or ego" is of "selfish, hedonistic or egocentric" origin.
  4. The world of equestrian sport is by its very nature eugenicist, as it focuses solely on performance.
  5. after their exploitation in equestrian, equine or breeding activities...
The use of such loaded language as "degrade" and "exploitation" are dead giveaways of non-neutral editing. Hence the Template:POV tagging. See also WP:PODIUM, "Wikipedia is not a venue for raising the visibility of an issue or agenda. Cooperate with other editors to neutrally summarize notable topics using reliable sources without advocating any particular position or giving undue weight to minority views."
  ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 19:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Possible AI generated text

[edit]

Concerns have been raised about AI-generated content in this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. The rationale given: these 2024 edits; user has made many AI edits and these also display WP:AISIGNS - superficial analyses, vocab distro typical of 2024 LLM output, etc. Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:34, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply