Talk:Epukiro
Add topic | A fact from Epukiro appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2012. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Epukiro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303204748/http://www.marcwitte.de/fernreisen/1997-namibia/diplom/diplom.htm to http://www.marcwitte.de/fernreisen/1997-namibia/diplom/diplom.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030201908/http://www.rcchurch.na/omi/History.htm to http://www.rcchurch.na/omi/History.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Allocation of resettlement farms to farmers
[edit]The allocation of farms to disadvantaged farmers is a good thing but giving a farmer land that they're not able to develop even just a bit within a period of 5 year's is a waste of land and denied opportunity to a farmer that is able to sustain thier selfs and add value and improvement to the farm.I think the government should change the number of years to 5 or 10 years for observation .If the farmer is & was able to add reasonable valued development to the land and him/herself than they should be granted the 99 years. Ratuud (talk) 02:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)