Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a85aba8d433a24

Jump to content

Talk:Epagogix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Natebailey in topic Info needing better cites

Info needing better cites

[edit]

they offer a money back guarantee for any film they work on that follows their recommendations that does not earn at least 183% of their production budget from domestic box office alone which, frankly, shocked me because I had never encountered anyone willing to do that. http://soreeyes.org/archive/2006/10/20/calling-bullshit-on-epagogix/#comment-31681

in our most recent test for a major film studio, we were 100% more accurate than the studio in determining in advance of release whether these films would earn more in US Box Office revenue than their respective all in negative cost of production (all production costs, but excluding the cost of prints and marketing). This measure typically will determine if a film will be net profitable. There are many significant exceptions to this rule of thumb, but none of these exceptions were relevant to the nine film scripts we analyzed. http://soreeyes.org/archive/2006/10/20/calling-bullshit-on-epagogix/#comment-31661 Natebailey (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply