Talk:Environmental standard
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 30 December 2018. Further details are available here. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Andrewkuo17. Peer reviewers: Nmohnatkin, WRobertson.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Fairtrade
[edit]This page (current revision) contains information that overlaps with Fairtrade labelling, that has problems with tone and POV and has been tagged for cleanup. I would reduce it to a link to Fairtrade labelling, but the title is really wrong for the material, and more importantly many ecological and scientific pages have (what were) redlinks to this page. Accordingly, I'm going to just replace the current content with something stublike that will hopefully provoke more appropriate content here. I see this as preferable to deleting this material to go back to redlinks on linking pages. -- cmh 19:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Types of environmental standards
[edit]"The three main types of environmental standards, ambient, emission, and technology, work together to help regulate the impact human activity have on the environment. The regulation of ambient pollutants in the air ensures that the air remains breathable and does not further deteriorate. Emission standards are enacted to control the amount of pollutants that are released into the air in order to maintain air quality. Technological standards are put in place to encourage progressiveness across different industries."
This types are only valid for pollution, single source of world bank related to pollution mentions this types. So I decided to cross this part out in my revised article.--CoElArnold (talk) 05:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)