Talk:Environment Agency

---

Add Topic "The EA is concerned with climate change and Energy, per http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/business/topics/115167.aspx

Add Topic:

The EA is concerned with climate change and Energy.

99.190.82.217 (talk) 07:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Not in citation given; partially in the title, but titles are not reliable even if the source were reliable. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

The EA has a Climate Change Team as part of its Evidence Directorate. The following text is off the EA Intranet: "The Environment Agency has a lead role in adapting England and Wales to the impacts of climate change (adaptation), and limiting the effects by guiding the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (mitigation). We aim to ensure that adaptation and mitigation measures minimise environmental harm and support environmental improvement, energy security and sustainable development." I can access this beacuse I work there, but I don't think this is directly usable as a source. The gist of it certainly deserves a place in the article though. Bazonka (talk) 11:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

I see your point. I also see little relationship between the IP's section and the "gist" of your comment. Perhaps you could propose something? The existence of a "Climate Change Team" should be documented somewhere on the outside.... — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

A quick search of the EA website gives this page , stating "We are taking a leading role in limiting and preparing for the impacts of climate change." Bazonka (talk) 16:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

See related wikilinks Climate change mitigation, Adaptation to global warming, Human impact on the environment, Environmental resources management, Sustainability and environmental management, etc ... 97.87.29.188 (talk) 00:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

... Sustainability#Definition, Ecosystem services, Planetary boundaries, Planetary management, ... 99.181.158.237 (talk) 04:54, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

What point are you trying to make? Bazonka (talk) 10:26, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Bazonka, It appears to be directed to Mr. Rubin, see the past months of Special:Contributions/Arthur_Rubin. Also note that User:Arthur Rubin has a history of deleting others User Talk page comments, clear Wikipedia:TPG violations. If of continued interest, User:Arthur Rubin (Arthur Rubin) on User Talk:Zodon http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zodon&diff=429845197&oldid=429841834 ... on March 30th 2011 it was User talk:Granitethighs http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Granitethighs&diff=prev&oldid=421531277 and User talk:OhanaUnited http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OhanaUnited&diff=421531280&oldid=421528249 These are related to Template:Sustainability and Sustainability (and related topics). 99.190.80.91 (talk) 06:14, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

You should know who it was directed to to whom it was directed, because you wrote it. And, although this talk page comment has nothing to do with editing this article, or, for that matter, any other article, I'm not going to delete it. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

References

Obamafication

Almost everything here, including the logo has been tampered with, and not for the better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.136.120.27 (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

What on earth are you talking about? Bazonka (talk) 19:40, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Its just vandalism like his/her other edits . Sigh.........  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   22:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Sewage pollution - why no mention of failures of EA?

The scandal of sewage pollution in rivers and coasts needs examining in as much detail, with as much blame, as the flooding issues. ~2026-12924-88 (talk) 11:20, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

I came here to say this also; though I'm not sure where to begin. The recent TV series Dirty Business has covered it well, and the related press coverage gives us some good, reliable sources, such as , , & . Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:56, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Paul Powlesland

Can someone add the recent Paul Powlesland investigation into the criticism section? ~2026-37544-83 (talk) 10:59, 30 June 2026 (UTC)