Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a253b2329a19e88e

Jump to content

Talk:Enlightenment Now

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Mohamed CJ in topic Quillette

Sources for reception/coverage

[edit]

I've been trying to keep up with the coverage and reception this book has been getting. Here's a list of the sources about it I've found that aren't already cited in the article:

I'd like to discuss which of these reviews are important enough to be cited here. I think that the review from the London Times definitely should be, but some of the other reviews I've listed are from newspapers and magazines I'm not familiar with, so I don't know how prominent they are. --Captain Occam (talk) 00:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Softball interviews with the author aren't reliable independent secondary sources, and should be used sparingly. Most of the reviews listed seem fine, for tricycle and harvard magazine you'd need to provide some evidence that they are WP:RS that possess WP:WEIGHT.


Anyone know of a non-blog[1] source for Stuart Pimm's position on extinctions[2] being misrepresented in the book? -- Jeandré, 2018-03-16t12:41z

References

[edit]
  1. Monbiot, George (2018-03-07). "You can deny environmental calamity – until you check the facts". The Guardian. Retrieved 2018-03-14.
  2. De Vos, Jurriaan M.; Joppa, Lucas N.; Gittleman, John L.; Stephens, Patrick R.; Pimm, Stuart L. (2014-08-26). "Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction". Conservation Biology. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 452–462. doi:10.1111/cobi.12380. ISSN 1523-1739. Retrieved 2018-03-14.

Quillette

[edit]

@Aquillion: I understand that Quillette is not seen in good light in general, however I don't see why a relevant opinion about the book by them was removed . Mohamed CJ (talk) 16:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply