Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Someone more qualified to discuss this than me should mention that many (I suppose most) irregular verbs in English were once regular verbs in Old English, and they have inherited the sound changes from their Old English conjugations. Bugloaf (talk) 13:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
You are right. It is technically incorrect to refer to strong verbs as irregular verbs in English. True "irregular" verbs in English, in the sense of being "anomalous", are verbs like "go" or "do", which are neither weak nor strong. I suggest that a professional linguist review this article. 161.24.19.44 (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There aren't really "irregular" verbs, except perhaps be. There's strong verbs (all seven classes), dental preterites, and the anomalous do, go, and grammaticalized will. This page probably could do with a rewrite. Irbisgreif (talk) 17:59, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
sa;ls,k';qa5eqsa03d5a4q+3d69a5q
+98+65.3
Fukken agree with you there, man. 81.191.68.231 (talk) 14:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
In my opinion they are irregular verbs since there's no way to guess the past simple and past participle form. There is a rule explaining why the past simple and past participle form of "want" is "wanted" (to make the ps and pp form of most verbs, add "-ed" to them), but there's no rule explaining why the word "sink" has "sank" (or "sunk" in AmE) as its ps form and "sunk" as its past participle form is "sunk". This something that needs to be learn by heart ~2026-37577-46 (talk) 22:31, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply