Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22fcbbc49b92da2

Jump to content

Talk:Enger Tower

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by JGHFunRun in topic Folly?

Elevation

[edit]

This article has given several numbers for the tower's elevation above Lake Superior, all of which appear to be wrong. Outside sources also have errors. The USGS topographic maps show the ground elevation above sea level at the tower's base between the 1180 and 1190 foot contours (closer to the latter). The level of Lake Superior in recent years has been ~600-603 feet. So the base of the tower seems to be about 586-590' above the lake, not the 431, 531, or 1531 given at various times in the article history. The tower itself is reported to be 80' high.

I have removed the erroneous 1531' figure, and we cannot rely on the figure from Emporis or the other cited sources. We need a good source for the ground at the base (and the ground is not completely level there) and a specific and identified average figure for the lake level. Kablammo (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Folly?

[edit]

I just read the Folly article - I didn't know that so formalized a definition existed. I'd value your input - should the Enger Tower be categorized as a folly? Brain Rodeo (talk) 20:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't think so; although it was built in honor of Enger, it is an observation tower, and its appearance does not suggest otherwise. ~JGHFunRun (tc) 18:47, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply