Talk:Engageante
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by Libby norman in topic De-stubbed
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
De-stubbed
[edit]This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified.
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubbified.
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 15:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Article appears to have been restubbed for Women's History and this also seems appropriate for Fashion. Rather than being a mark of unreliability, a stub classification actually denotes an article that needs further development – either in content or via better references or both. In this instance, there are no inline citations so that would be a starting point for improvement. Libby norman (talk) 17:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 | This article was recategorized in 2006 in accordance with a scheme for organizing articles in Category:History of clothing. That effort has been superseded by WikiProject Fashion. |