Talk:Energoatom

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move to Energoatom; hatnote link to Rosenergoatom. Only two uses; no need for dab page. Born2cycle (talk) 23:59, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Energoatom (Ukraine) → Energoatom Energoatom (Russia) was renamed back to Rosenergoatom in 2009, hence no need for disambiguation Corella (talk) 01:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

• But there will still be plenty older literature about that says "Energoatom" for the Russian organization. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
  • That sounds easy to handle via hatnote. Currently, Energoatom is a dab page, so readers looking for either one have an extra click. If we move this to "Energoatom", then at least some readers are saved that click. If the page were huge, that might mean the difference between a fast load and a slow one, but this article's not much longer than a dab page. Support move. -GTBacchus^(talk) 18:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Also, the Russian Rosenergoatom was only named Energoatom for one year. Before that it was Rosenergoatom - there was a campaign for the old name back.Corella (talk) 10:54, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

chernobyl

why is the Capture of Chernobyl not in Military actions at Ukrainian NPPs adressed? Hängebauchschweinchen (talk) 02:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)