Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22c2feca95c1709

Jump to content

Talk:Empty domain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Membership

[edit]

“an empty set having no members”. When exactly can the empty set have members?

Empty conjuction vs. Empty disjunction

[edit]

"An analogous case is the trivial truth of the empty conjunction and falsehood of the empty disjunction ...". Neither of them is well-formed formula. Can we speak about their turth?

Okay, allow us to talk about non-wff, what is the difference (in form) between an empty conjuction and an empty disjunction? It seems to me that they are both empty formula. If there is no difference in form but they are different in semantic, isn't it really strange?

Further, the way the truth conditions stated is a bit strange. It excludes discussion for empty conjunction (disjunction). Tomlee2060 (talk) 02:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

An empty conjunction would not actually be a formula, you're right. It's what you get by starting with the shorthand notation and setting k to 0. An empty disjunction is similar. So here there is already information about whether a conjecuntion or disjunction is intended. This is entirely parallel to an empty sum in algebra, which is not a term, but a special case of summation notation.  Carl (CBM · talk) 11:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply