Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a253b5f7d97614c2

Jump to content

Talk:Employment Relations Act 2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Adam Maynard in topic Compulsory Unionism

Untitled

[edit]

A number of countries (including Britain) have passed "Employment Relations Act" s. The expression should not redirect to the New Zealand Act.Johncmullen1960 (talk) 12:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Compulsory Unionism

[edit]

Deleted previous addition to Freeloading section

"However, compulsory unionism is incompatible with the right of freedom of association (or non-association) which was one of the rights guaranteed under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990."

Reason: Compulsory unionism is not incompatible with NZ BOR as freedom of association only protects the right to come together with other individuals and collectively express, promote, pursue and defend common interests. see:freedom of association. Freedom of association does not protect against enforced association as this would be incompatible with several other areas of common law such as imprisonment and the ability to gather taxes (as it could be argued that being forced to be a NZ citizen would be incompatible). --Adam (talk) 17:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply