Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a236823079c52da2

Jump to content

Talk:Emotional Design

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by JeffJonez in topic Article about the Book or the Concept?


Untitled

[edit]

Mr Daniel,

I am not sure why you removed information about Designing Emotions in Online Travel, a scientifical report, that is strongly related to the book of Don Norman? The article didn't contain any links to a commercial website. Why is it that the book of Don Norman is promoted at this page and important additional information based on a comprehensive study is rejected?. I also like to know what your expertise is in the field of emotional design and how you can judge which information is relevant for the users of Wikipedia. Rene

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses Nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--St.daniel 23:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Article about the Book or the Concept?

[edit]

This article is an odd duck. It should be about the concept of emotional design, with supporting sources. Instead, it's an article about a source, proposing the concept. Can anyone justify this or point to another wikipedia article in this vein? - JeffJonez (talk) 18:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply